Page MenuHomeHEPForge

Control radiation corrections in TAUOLA
ClosedPublic

Authored by abudinen on Tue, Jan 7, 2:53 PM.

Details

Summary

Added arguments to steer radiation corrections in TAUOLA.

This is associated with !42 and T250.

Test Plan

As shown in !42, in the current master branch TAUOLA FSR and PHOTOS are both ON by default (with different photon energy cut-off values), so we are generating FSR twice. We observe that, with TAUOLA FSR ON and PHOTOS OFF, we obtain similar results as with TAUOLA FSR OFF and PHOTOS ON (after equalising the photon energy cut-off value). The latter is now the default configuration. When compared with master branch we observe different results for the tests after the modifications in this differential, but these are expected.

Diff Detail

Repository
rEVTGEN evtgen
Branch
TAUOLA-Radiation
Lint
No Lint Coverage
Unit
No Test Coverage
Build Status
Buildable 357
Build 357: arc lint + arc unit

Event Timeline

abudinen created this revision.
abudinen changed the visibility from "All Users" to "Public (No Login Required)".Tue, Jan 7, 3:03 PM
abudinen changed the edit policy from "All Users" to "Restricted Project (Project)".
abudinen added a project: Restricted Project.

Tests for leptonic tau decays in tauola show no significant differences after implementation of these changes.

IIRC from the discussion in !42, that's not quite right. Rather there are differences but they are as expected, i.e. we've stopped doubling-up the radiation in certain decays. Is that right?

In D135#3696, @tlatham wrote:

Tests for leptonic tau decays in tauola show no significant differences after implementation of these changes.

IIRC from the discussion in !42, that's not quite right. Rather there are differences but they are as expected, i.e. we've stopped doubling-up the radiation in certain decays. Is that right?

So what I meant is that tests with Tauola radiation ON and PHOTOS OFF give similar results as Tauola radiation OFF and PHOTOS ON, as shown in !42. Compared with master branch the tests should give different results, as expected since now we are not doing double generation of FSR, as shown also in !42.

abudinen edited the test plan for this revision. (Show Details)

Thanks for clarifying!

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Tue, Jan 7, 10:22 PM