\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline{section}{\numberline{1}Improving the SM-likeness criterion}{1}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline{subsection}{\numberline{1.1}The current implementation}{1}}
\newlabel{Eq:oldDelta}{{4}{1}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline{subsection}{\numberline{1.2}The new implementation}{1}}
\newlabel{Eq:newsignalstrength}{{5}{1}}
\newlabel{Eq:deltacj}{{6}{1}}
\newlabel{Eq:newDelta}{{8}{1}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline{figure}{\numberline{1}{\ignorespaces Channel weights for different production modes (assuming everywhere the same decay mode which thus factors out) for LHC7 and Tevatron.}}{2}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline{subfigure}{\numberline{(a)}{\ignorespaces{LHC7 production weights.}}}{2}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline{subfigure}{\numberline{(b)}{\ignorespaces{Tevatron production weights.}}}{2}}
\newlabel{Fig:weights}{{1}{2}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline{subsection}{\numberline{1.3}Introduction of a weighting factor}{2}}
\newlabel{Eq:weightik}{{11}{2}}
\newlabel{Eq:weightj}{{12}{2}}
\newlabel{Eq:muweighted}{{13}{2}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline{subsection}{\numberline{1.4}Performance of the different implementations}{3}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline{figure}{\numberline{2}{\ignorespaces Applicability of the combined Higgs search from CMS-HIG-12-008 under variation of effective Higgs couplings for different implementations of the SM likeness test. In (\textit{a,b}) [(\textit{c,d})], we vary the normalized squared effective Higgs-gluon-gluon, $g^2_{hgg}$, [Higgs-vector boson, $g^2_{hWW} = g^2_{hZZ}$] coupling over the searches Higgs mass range. The implementation in (\textit{a,c}) does not employ weights while they are used in (\textit{b,d}). The color corresponds to \texttt{obsratio}.}}{5}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline{figure}{\numberline{3}{\ignorespaces Applicability of the combined Higgs search from CMS-HIG-12-008 under variation of the squared effective Higgs couplings $g^2_{hgg}$, $g^2_{hWW} = g^2_{hZZ}$ and $g^2_{htt}$: (\textit{a}) without weights, (\textit{b, c, d}) with weights. We set the Higgs mass to $m_H=250\nobreakspace {}\mathrm {GeV}$. The color corresponds to \texttt{obsratio}.}}{6}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline{figure}{\numberline{4}{\ignorespaces Applicability of the ATLAS Higgs search arXiv:1202.1414 ($H\to\gamma\gamma$) under variation of effective Higgs couplings for different implementations of the SM likeness test. In (\textit{a,b}) [(\textit{c,d})], we vary the normalized squared effective Higgs-gluon-gluon, $g^2_{hgg}$, [Higgs-vector boson, $g^2_{hWW} = g^2_{hZZ}$] coupling over the relevant Higgs mass range. The implementation in (\textit{a,c}) does not employ weights while they are used in (\textit{b,d}). The color corresponds to \texttt{obsratio}.}}{7}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline{figure}{\numberline{5}{\ignorespaces Applicability of the ATLAS Higgs search arXiv:1202.1414 under variation of the squared effective Higgs couplings $g^2_{hgg}$, $g^2_{hWW} = g^2_{hZZ}$ and $g^2_{htt}$: (\textit{a}) without weights, (\textit{b, c, d}) with weights. We set the Higgs mass to $m_H=125\nobreakspace {}\mathrm {GeV}$. The color corresponds to \texttt{obsratio}.}}{8}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline{figure}{\numberline{6}{\ignorespaces Channel ratio dependence on the modified effective squared couplings for the implementation with and without weights for the channels of the $H\to\gamma\gamma$ search \texttt{arXiv:1202.1414}. We set the Higgs mass to $m_H=125\nobreakspace {}\mathrm {GeV}$. In the gray regions the SM likeness test fails. Other channel ratios not plotted are equal to 1.}}{9}}